Illness Can Contribute to Dryness (and Contemplation)

Hildegard, Teresa Thérèse, Elisabeth

What do Saint Hildegard, Saint Teresa, Saint Thérèse, and Blessed Elizabeth of the Trinity have in common? Aside from being reliable teachers and guides (three of them are Doctors of the Church), they all suffered life-long or life-destroying ill health. Hildegard suffered from severe migraines; Thérèse suffered greatly from tuberculosis; Elizabeth died of Addison’s disease; and Teresa wrote as if she could hardly remember what it would be like to be physically well for an extended period of time.

Oh, and what else do they have in common? They were contemplatives. To be sure, Hildegard and Teresa had a lot of activity in their long lives also. But they were contemplatives, indeed cloistered contemplatives, first and foremost.

Based on such a small sampling of data, we should be forgiven from making a hasty correlation between illness and contemplation.

But what, if there is any correlation, is the cause? Is it that contemplation is not contemplation, but a by-product of illness? No. Is it that contemplation is unhealthy and leads to illness? No. The cause of all this is that we are weak, and in our weakness, God’s strength can be manifested. God delights in showing his strength in human weakness. He loves to do it – because he loves us.

This is a not uncommon emphasis of the saints. Especially when talking to anyone with a contemplative bent or an inclination for mortification, many saints like to stress human weakness. Even great ascetics like Saint Catherine of Siena like to stress human weakness! In a letter to a friend who was placing too much emphasis on her own penances, works, and healthful actions, she writes,

It may happen that a sick body is obliged to give up its habits in life; then it falls at once into weariness and confusion of mind, deprived of all gladness; it thinks itself condemned and confounded, and finds no sweetness in prayer, such as it seemed to have in the time of its penance. And where did this sweetness go? It’s been lost, with the personal will on which it was built.

Catherine points out that certain sweetnesses are felt because of our self-will. We find delight because we seek it, whether bodily or spiritual. And the spiritual delight sought, by choosing one’s own penances and works to suit one’s fancies, is something we need to lose. Illness, Catherine attests, allows us to do just that: lose the desire for these spiritual consolations that are self-willed. Illness requires abandon: abandoning ourselves into our Providential Father’s hands.

That’s the focus Saint Francis de Sales gives, too, writing to a woman with a crippling and painful condition:

What do you think a bed of suffering is? It is nothing else than the school of humility where we learn all about our misery and weakness, and how vain, delicate, and weak we are… One of the great benefits of suffering is that we come to see the depths of our own nothingness.

Illness can be an opportunity. And elsewhere, speaking more generally:

God’s will is as much in sickness as in health, and ordinarily almost more so; wherefore if we love health better, let us never say that this is in order to serve God the better, for who sees not that it is health that we look for in God’s will, not God’s will in health.

If God prefers our weaknesses to manifest his strength, why should we prefer something else? Likewise, in a pastoral but dense letter to a friend who was lying in bed ill, Saint John of Ávila writes,

Call on Him for aid with all your heart, that as He has weakened your body by His touch, your soul may run to Him the more swiftly.

It is a grace. It is an opportunity. It is just human weakness, and that lets us throw ourselves with more abandon into the hands of our Father. Indeed, even if our mind is weakened, our will in weakened, our imagination, our memory, all of our faculties – this too can be, in Christ, a gain:

Although you cannot now keep up your customary reading and meditation as you would wish, still, do all you can without serious injury to your health. Our Lord is so good and so powerful that He gives strength to those He sees to be doing their best. Sometimes He bestows more favours on people who lie ill in bed and are unable to pray than on others who spend hours in prayer. Perhaps He will show you this mercy, which depends solely on His will.

That’s the simple Gospel: God wants us, and our weakness is no impediment. It’s just the opposite. Get up – not literally – and pray. God will come to you in your weakness. Say, “Abba, Daddy!” Try to focus on him, and if you can’t, just rest in a general loving knowledge that you are in his hands.

Some related posts:


5 responses to “Illness Can Contribute to Dryness (and Contemplation)”

  1. SaintlySages Avatar

    Very interesting insights! I can see many of these things in peoples’ lives. Thank you for posting. God bless!

  2. Ann Chapin Avatar

    The issue of suffering and illness is complex, and you know how some Christians see it quite differently. True, it does make us aware of our fundamental and core weaknesses, however, it is also the case that God heals people as we see from Lourdes and so many other cases in the history of the church and the life of Christ. So it seems it can’t be the case that being in a state of illness is in some sense ‘better spiritually’ than being healthy, for if that were the case, then what would we make of God healing people?
    Maybe it depends upon the overall maturity of the person and to what degree they want to carry the cross for the sake of others. The passages in Paul where he talks about being happy to suffer for the benefit of others are just hints into the whole subject of ‘redemptive suffering’ – and don’t you think that those sorts of cases are somehow different from the suffering we undergo as a result of our own stupidity or weaknesses? Let’s say someone smoked their whole life and gets lung cancer…that feels different than the case of Elizabeth with Addison’s or Therese with TB, don’t you think? But different how, exactly? We may say that well, in the one case the person brought it on themselves, but in the other it was totally undeserved. That sort of thinking makes me nervous, as if we can discern when we bring suffering on ourselves or not. I don’t think God has any less compassion and tenderness for the person suffering the lung cancer than for the case of Elizabeth or Therese…so maybe God regards all our suffering as redemptive, whether we bring it on ourselves or not? A tough subject. Thanks for your thoughts on this!

    1. Ben (เบ็น) Avatar

      I think that you’re right that it’s difficult for us to “discern when we bring suffering on ourselves or not.” In any case, there are environmental factors which we may not even (collectively or personally) understand. Diseases are always complex things. There are so many factors. I don’t think even physicians and biologists assert that they know the limits of all these factors.

      I think what the saints focus on when they make these recommendations about illness is God’s providence. Sure, we repent for sins. We have often sinned against our body by excess and by negligence (we may even be neglecting our health *while* ill!). But sins actually do not cause diseases. Sins do not exclusively cause any diseases at all. (“Who sinned, this man or his parents?” “Neither… This man is [ill] so that God’s works can be made manifest in him.”) God’s providence allows diseases (which may have contributing factors from particular sins). But it is sins themselves that we repent of, not their potential contribution to illness.

      To actually recognize, not with our words only but with our attitude and actions, that God’s works are in his providence seems to be what the quotes above are aiming at (especially the one from John of Avila: we are weak; “perhaps He will show you this mercy, which depends solely on His will.”).

      So, while we may bring diseases on ourselves to some extent (and this can be so even while ill and not seeking health by the human means available), we should also recognize that bringing diseases on ourselves is not necessarily a result of sin (social or personal). And what is not a result of sin needs no repentance. It just needs more of God’s presence! I think that is what these saints are finding. Aren’t they encouraging a finding of God’s presence in his providence, showing us how we are and letting us grow? Catherine of Siena especially points out: this makes you weak, and your own self-will has to die.

      I agree for sure that any suffering can be “co-redemptive” with Christ if we unite it to the Cross (and die to that self-will). There is no tabooed suffering, except sin itself. In “Salvifici Doloris” (an apostolic letter), Pope St. John Paul II even called suffering “good” on that account. God’s providence and invitation are in any/all suffering. =)

      1. Ann Chapin Avatar

        Thanks for your note. As you point out, what is the core here is how to react to the illness, not to attribute blame, cause, etc. We have no idea of the cause and assigning blame is not helpful either – so regardless of all that, we still have to decide how we’ll react to it. And that means either bitterness, self-pity, resentment, or an opportunity to grow closer to Christ by continuing to trust in divine love in spite of whatever illness. It is the trusting in spite of that makes the suffering salvific, yes.

Leave a comment